Those wide margins are a far cry from Trump’s near-miss in Minnesota in 2016 when he lost by 44,000 votes out of more than 2.6 million cast — one of the closest margins in the country.
Now, it’s currently October 2019, not November 2020. And as J. Patrick Coolican of the Strib noted in a recent piece
that Trump’s 2020 campaign is already spending heavily in a state that has two things that should work in Trump’s favor: 1) A large number of white, working-class voters and 2) a booming economy.
Even so, these poll numbers have to put something of a damper on the Trump campaign’s much-publicized hopes of putting Minnesota in their column. That same Star Tribune poll put Trump’s job approval at just 40%, a very tough starting place to begin a winning campaign.
To be clear: Trump doesn’t need to win Minnesota to get reelected. He didn’t win the state in 2016 and won the Electoral College relatively easily.
The bigger issue here for Trump is whether his numbers in Minnesota are indicative of a broader weakness across the industrial Midwest — Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin — where he won the 2016 election. Trump’s job approval numbers in these states has been consistent
with the numbers in the Star Tribune poll for at least the last year. If that trend continues, his path to a second term narrows significantly.
The Point: Trump’s 2020 electoral map is already quite narrow. If his Minnesota numbers indicate a broader softening in the region, look out.